Case Title | The Principal Commissioner Central Tax, Guntur CGST Commissionerate. |
Court | Andhra Pradesh AAAR |
Honorable Judges | Justice suresh Kishnani Justice Ravi Shankar Narayan |
Citation | 2022 (01) GSTPanacea 466 HC Andhra Pradesh Order /AAAR/APl04 (GST)/2022 |
Judgment Date | 24-01-2022 |
The Principal Commissioner, Central Tax, Guntur CGST Commissionerate (hereinafter referred to as appellant) filed an appeal in case of M/s. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (APSRTC), Pandit Nehru Bus Station, RTC House, 1’t Floor, Bhaskar Rao Pet, Vijayawada as per Rule 106(2) of CGST Rules, 2017 against the Advance Ruling issued under sub-section (6) of section 98 in FORM GST ARA-03 and no fee shall bepayable by the appellant for filing the appeal. The appeal dated: 08.11.2021 is filed contending the Ruling passed by the Authority for Advance Ruling, A.P vide Ruling AAR No.2slAPlGSr /2021 dated 20.07.2021.
The Andhra Pradesh Bench of the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) recently rendered a decision affirming the ruling of the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) regarding the Goods and Services Tax (GST) implications on the lease of buses by the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (APSRTC) to the Public Transport Department (PTD) of the Government of Andhra Pradesh. The AAAR panel, comprising members Suresh Kishnani and Ravi Shankar Narayan, upheld the AAR’s determination that this particular transaction qualified for exemption from GST.
In essence, the ruling implies that the lease arrangement between APSRTC and the PTD, pertaining to buses, falls within the scope of GST exemption as outlined in the relevant provisions. This decision likely considered various aspects, including the nature of the transaction, the legal framework governing such leases, and the specific criteria for GST exemption.
The significance of this ruling lies in its potential impact on the tax liability and financial considerations for both APSRTC and the PTD. By affirming the GST exemption, the AAAR has provided clarity on the tax treatment of this specific type of transaction, offering guidance not only to the parties involved but also establishing a precedent that may influence similar cases in the future.
It’s worth noting that such decisions by appellate authorities contribute to the evolving landscape of GST jurisprudence, shaping interpretations and providing a legal framework for businesses and government entities engaging in diverse transactions. Overall, the AAAR’s decision brings a resolution to the matter at hand, bringing confidence and understanding to the involved parties regarding the GST implications of the lease agreement between APSRTC and the PTD.
Download Pdf:
For Reference Visit:
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Read Another Case Law:
GST Case Law