Star Rays VS Union Of India

This petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pertains to a claim for the refund of Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) that was paid on goods exported by the petitioner. The amount sought for refund is Rs. 8.42 crores, covering the period from July 2017 to January 2018. The petitioner challenges the denial or non-issuance of the refund, arguing that the IGST paid on the export of goods is refundable under the applicable laws and regulations. The petition aims to seek relief from the court to ensure compliance with the provisions of the GST Act concerning export refunds, which are designed to avoid the tax burden on goods that are meant for international markets. The petitioner asserts that the refund claim is legitimate and that the non-refund has caused financial strain. The case highlights issues related to the interpretation and implementation of GST refund provisions for exports and calls for judicial intervention to resolve the matter in favor of the petitioner.

This petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is seeking a refund of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) that was paid on goods that were exported. The total refund amount requested is Rs. 8.42 crores, covering the period from July 2017 to January 2018. The petitioner is challenging the non-refund of the IGST, which was levied on exports, arguing that the amount should be reimbursed as per the provisions governing export taxation under the GST regime.

During the proceedings, Mr. Kantharia, the counsel for the respondents, stated that there were technical difficulties which hindered the reconciliation of the shipping bills and the invoices. These technical issues prevented the proper processing of the refund. However, he assured the court that the system has now been rectified. Consequently, the petitioner is now able to make the necessary adjustments and corrections in the required forms, specifically Form GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, which are essential for the reconciliation and processing of the refund.

The resolution of these technical difficulties is crucial for the petitioner to proceed with the refund process. The rectification of the system implies that the administrative barriers that were preventing the reconciliation and verification of the export documents have been addressed, thereby facilitating the refund process. The court’s decision will likely hinge on the petitioner’s ability to modify the forms correctly and the final validation of the refund claim in light of the updated system functionalities.

This petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, requests a refund of the integrated goods and services tax (IGST) that was paid on goods exported between July 2017 and January 2018. The total refund claimed is Rs. 8.42 crores. The matter concerns the reconciliation of shipping bills and invoices, which had been hindered by technical difficulties.

Mr. Kantharia, representing the respondents, explained that these technical issues have now been resolved. Consequently, the petitioner is now able to amend the necessary details in Form GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B.

In response, Mr. Shah, counsel for the petitioners, assured that the required modifications to the forms will be completed within one week from the date of the hearing.

This case involves a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a refund of the integrated goods and services tax (IGST) that was paid on goods exported by the petitioner. The total refund amount claimed is Rs. 8.42 crores and pertains to exports made between July 2017 and January 2018.

The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Shah, has indicated that the petitioner will make the required adjustments in their GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B forms within one week. The adjustments are necessary to reconcile the shipping bills with the invoices, a process that had previously been hampered by technical difficulties.

On the other hand, the respondents’ counsel, Mr. Kantharia, acknowledged these technical issues and confirmed that the system has been rectified. Consequently, the petitioner will now be able to modify the forms accordingly. Mr. Kantharia also assured that the refund applications would be processed and disposed of within eight weeks from the date the petitioner completes the modifications and informs the respondents.

This arrangement aims to resolve the refund claim efficiently, ensuring that all procedural requirements are met to facilitate the refund process.

Download PDF:

For Reference Visit:

Read Another Case Law:

GST Case Law: