Case Title | Sakthivel VS The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes |
Court | Madras High court |
Honorable judgwes | Justice Mohammed Shaffiq |
citation | 2022 (11) GSTPanacea 506 HC Madras W.P.(MD)No.25299 of 2022 |
Judgement Date | 08-November-2022 |
the prolonged illness caused by COVID-19, the proprietor of the petitioner’s business was unable to fulfill their tax obligations, leading to the failure to file Goods and Services Tax (GST) monthly returns for six consecutive months. As a consequence, the Registration Certificate of the petitioner’s business was cancelled pursuant to Section 29 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, effective from January 24, 2022.
The petitioner has filed a Writ Petition challenging this cancellation order. Their primary argument, presented by their legal counsel, revolves around the severe impact of illness on the proprietor’s ability to manage the business affairs. Specifically, the proprietor suffered from COVID-19, experiencing symptoms such as fever, which necessitated medical treatment and an extended period of bed rest.
Due to this incapacitation, the petitioner asserts that they were unable to meet their tax obligations within the stipulated timeframe. The petitioner’s contention is that the circumstances leading to the non-compliance were beyond their control and were a direct consequence of the global pandemic, which caused severe disruptions across various aspects of life and business operations.
The crux of the petitioner’s argument appears to be the plea for leniency and understanding in light of the extraordinary circumstances they faced. They seek to persuade the court to reinstate their Registration Certificate, emphasizing the unforeseeable and unavoidable nature of the events that led to their non-compliance with tax regulations.
In essence, the Writ Petition challenges the cancellation of the Registration Certificate by highlighting the extenuating circumstances surrounding the petitioner’s inability to fulfill their tax obligations due to the proprietor’s severe illness caused by COVID-19.
The case at hand involves a Writ Petition challenging the cancellation of a Registration Certificate, based on the grounds that the petitioner failed to submit Goods and Services Tax (GST) monthly returns for a continuous six-month period. The Registration Certificate was consequently canceled effective January 24, 2022, citing Section 29 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
The petitioner’s legal counsel argues that the proprietor of the petitioner’s business faced severe health issues due to COVID-19, including a preliminary fever, which necessitated medical treatment and an extended period of bed rest. As a result, the petitioner was unable to fulfill their tax obligations during this time.
The crux of the petitioner’s argument rests on the exceptional circumstances surrounding the proprietor’s health, which prevented compliance with tax obligations. They contend that this should be taken into consideration before canceling the Registration Certificate.
The cancellation of the Registration Certificate has significant implications for the petitioner’s business operations, potentially leading to financial losses and other adverse effects. Therefore, the petitioner seeks relief from the court, requesting the annulment or reversal of the cancellation order.
The case raises broader questions about the balance between regulatory enforcement and recognizing extenuating circumstances that may affect compliance with tax obligations. It underscores the need for flexibility and understanding in such situations, particularly amid unforeseen events like the COVID-19 pandemic, which can severely disrupt business activities.
Ultimately, the court will need to weigh the legal requirements outlined in the GST Act against the petitioner’s argument regarding the exceptional circumstances surrounding their non-compliance. The decision reached will likely have implications beyond this specific case, shaping how similar situations are handled in the future and providing guidance on navigating the intersection of regulatory compliance and unforeseen challenges.
This writ petition challenges an order cancelling the Registration Certificate due to the petitioner’s failure to file Goods and Services Tax (GST) monthly returns for six consecutive months, as per Section 29 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
The petitioner’s counsel argues that the proprietor’s severe illness, particularly from COVID-19, led to prolonged bed rest, hindering compliance. They request leniency in penalties and fees, proposing that such charges not be deducted from any unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC). Further, they suggest that any utilized ITC must undergo scrutiny and approval by a competent officer before future use. The petitioners agree to pay GST and file returns post-cancellation, with payments made in cash. Additionally, they consent to ITC utilization only after scrutiny and approval by authorities, with potential restrictions imposed by respondents to prevent misuse of ITC.
Overall, the petition seeks relief from penalties, proposes strict scrutiny of ITC usage, and requests a reinstatement of registration upon fulfilling tax obligations.
Download PDF:
For Reference Visit:
Read Another Case Law:
GST Case Law: