Case Title | Ramanujan Venkatesan Vs The Joint Commissioner |
Court | Madras High court |
Honorable Judges | Justice M.Sundar |
Citation | 2023 (01) GSTPanacea 305 HC Madras W.P.No.34774 of 2022 and W.M.P.No.34194 of 2022 |
Judgement Date | 02-January-2023 |
-
Context:
- The issue pertains to an order dated November 10, 2022, issued by the first respondent in an appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (C-G&ST Act).
- The order in question is identified by Ref. No. 347/2022 (GSTA-II)(JC).
-
Nature of the Appeal:
- The appeal was initiated following the cancellation of the writ petitioner’s Goods and Service Tax (GST) registration.
- The GST registration was cancelled due to the petitioner’s failure to file monthly returns as required under the C-G&ST Act.
-
Proceedings and Grounds of Appeal:
- Instead of seeking rectification of the cancellation, the writ petitioner chose to file an appeal, which led to the current proceedings under Appeal No. 347/2022.
- The appellate authority, however, dismissed the appeal on the grounds of limitation, meaning that the appeal was not filed within the prescribed time limit.
-
Key Issues:
- The central issue addressed in the impugned order is whether the appeal filed by the writ petitioner was within the allowable time frame.
- The appellate authority’s decision focused on the procedural aspect of timeliness rather than the substantive merits of the cancellation of GST registration.
-
Outcome:
- The impugned order concluded with the dismissal of the appeal due to it being time-barred.
- Consequently, the writ petitioner’s GST registration remains cancelled as a result of non-compliance with the monthly return filing requirements.
-
Current Status:
- The writ petitioner has challenged the appellate authority’s decision, bringing the matter to the court’s attention for judicial review.
Conclusion
The core of the legal dispute involves the procedural aspect of whether the appeal against the cancellation of GST registration was filed within the statutory period. The appellate authority dismissed the appeal due to it being filed beyond the allowable time limit, resulting in the writ petitioner seeking judicial intervention to challenge this procedural dismissal. The substantive issue of the GST registration cancellation stems from the non-filing of required monthly returns.
In a legal case concerning an order dated November 10, 2022, made by the first respondent in an appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (C-G&ST Act), identified by Ref. No. 347/2022 (GSTA-II)(JC), the petitioner has challenged the dismissal of their appeal. The appellate authority dismissed the appeal on the grounds of limitation, which means the appeal was not filed within the prescribed time limit.
The background facts of the case are that the petitioner’s Goods and Service Tax (GST) registration was cancelled due to the non-filing of monthly returns. Instead of seeking rectification of this cancellation, the petitioner chose to file an appeal, which was registered as Appeal No. 347/2022. This appeal led to the issuance of the contested order.
In summary, the primary issue at hand is the dismissal of the appeal by the appellate authority because it was filed beyond the allowed time period, rather than addressing the merits or details of the underlying GST registration cancellation.
The case involves an order dated 10.11.2022 made by the first respondent in an appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (C-G&ST Act). The appeal, bearing Ref. No. 347/2022 (GSTA-II)(JC), has been contested.
The appellate authority dismissed the appeal on the grounds of limitation. The writ petitioner’s Goods and Service Tax (GST) registration was cancelled due to the non-filing of monthly returns. Instead of seeking rectification, the petitioner filed an appeal (Appeal No. 347/2022), which resulted in the impugned order.
The court observed that if the petitioner chooses to apply afresh for GST registration, the application will be processed on its own merits and in accordance with the law.
Consequently, the captioned writ petition and the associated miscellaneous petition (WMP) are disposed of as closed, with no order as to costs.
Download PDF:
For Reference Visit:
Madras High Court
Read Another Case Law:
GST Case Law