No Corceive action to be taken by the respondent during proceeding on board at court adjudication?

No Corceive action

Case Title

ZT Stems India Pvt. Ltd.

Vs

Union of India and ors.

Court

Bombay High Court

Honorable Judges

Justice R.D.Dhanuka

Citation

2022 (11) GSTPanacea 275 HC Bombay

WPA 28 of 2022

Judgement Date

01-Nov-2022

Council for Petitioner

Abhishek Rastogi

Pratyushprabha Saha

Kanika Sharma

Council for UOI

 Pradeep S Jetly

Council for State

 

Favour

Assesee

Section

 

The Bombay High Court bench of Honourable Judge Justice  RD Dhanuka has held that  The personal presence of the directors of the petitioners before the respondents in response to the impugned summons shall be postponed till next date.

No Corceive action

FACTS OF THE CASE

In this case, the respondent is desired to ask the time 4 weeks time to take instruction and to file affidavit in reply from the date of this case order.

No Corceive action

COURT HELD

Respondent shall not take any corcieve steps against the director of petitioner pursuant to summon.

No Corceive action

ANALYSIS OF THE JUDGEMENT

Download PDF:

For Reference Visit:

Bombay High Court