Nagarjuna Agro Chemicals (P.) Ltd. Vs State of U.P.

The main question raised in this petition is whether the tax department is required to issue a notice under subsection 3 of Section 61 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 after the assessee has submitted returns, before taking action under Section 74 of the Act.

The petitioner, who is an assessee under the GST regime, submitted returns for the assessment year 2019-20. The department did not initiate any action under Section 61 of the Act. However, proceedings under Section 74 were initiated by the department against the petitioner regarding the classification and consequent tax payable on certain goods. Following examination of the issue, the department issued an order demanding the shortfall in previously paid tax, along with interest and penalty.

In essence, the key issue is whether the tax department must issue a notice under Section 61 before initiating action under Section 74, even if the assessee has already submitted returns.

The main question in the present petition is whether the tax department is required to issue a notice under subsection 3 of Section 61 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, after the assessee has submitted returns, before initiating action under Section 74 of the Act.

The petitioner, an assessee under the GST regime, has submitted returns for the assessment year 2019-20. However, the department has initiated proceedings under Section 74 against the petitioner on certain grounds related to the classification and consequent tax payable on certain goods. The department has issued an order demanding the deposit of the shortfall in tax payment, along with interest and penalty.

The petitioner argues that since returns were submitted, the department should have pointed out any deficiencies in the returns, allowing the petitioner an opportunity to rectify them before proceeding under Section 74.

Section 61 of the Act, 2017, outlines the process for scrutiny of returns and discrepancies noticed therein. It provides for informing the registered person of any discrepancies and seeking an explanation. If the explanation is found acceptable, no further action is taken. However, if no satisfactory explanation is furnished within the stipulated time, further action may be taken by the proper officer.

In essence, the question raised in the petition concerns the procedural requirements for initiating action under Section 74 of the Act following the submission of returns by the assessee.

The key question in the present petition is whether the department is required to issue a notice under subsection 3 of Section 61 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 after returns have been submitted by the assessee before initiating action under Section 74 of the Act.

The petitioner, an assessee under the GST regime, submitted returns for the assessment year 2019-20. The department initiated proceedings under Section 74 against the petitioner concerning the classification and consequential tax payable of certain goods. The department found a shortfall in the tax previously paid and issued a demand for the appropriate shortfall, along with interest and penalty.

The petitioner argues that since returns were submitted, the department should have pointed out any deficiencies in the returns, allowing the petitioner to rectify them before proceeding under Section 74.

Section 61 of the Act regulates the scrutiny of returns. It empowers the proper officer to scrutinize returns, inform the registered person of any discrepancies noticed, and seek explanations. If the explanation is found acceptable, no further action is taken. However, if no satisfactory explanation is furnished within a specified period, the proper officer may initiate appropriate action, including proceedings under Section 74.

The petitioner contends that the scrutiny under Section 61 is distinct and limited to the examination of returns and providing an opportunity for rectification. Therefore, the petitioner argues that the department should have followed the procedure outlined in Section 61 before initiating action under Section 74.

The main question in the present petition is whether the department is required to issue a notice under subsection 3 of Section 61 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 before initiating action under Section 74 of the Act, even if returns have been submitted by the assessee.

The petitioner, an assessee under the GST regime, submitted returns for the assessment year 2019-20. The department initiated proceedings under Section 74 against the petitioner for certain grounds related to the classification and consequent tax payable of certain goods. The department found a shortfall in the tax previously paid and raised a demand for the appropriate shortfall, along with interest and penalty.

The petitioner argues that since returns were submitted, the department should have pointed out any deficiencies in the returns before proceeding under Section 74. Section 61 of the Act allows the proper officer to scrutinize returns and inform the assessee of any discrepancies noticed. If no satisfactory explanation is furnished within a specified period, the officer may initiate appropriate action under various sections, including Section 74.

The court notes that scrutiny proceedings under Section 61 and proceedings under Section 74 are distinct. Issuing a notice under Section 61(3) is not a condition precedent for initiating action under Section 74. The court also observes that a previous judgment cited by the petitioner does not restrict the exercise of jurisdiction under Section 74 based on the issuance of a notice under Section 61(3).

In summary, the court finds that the department’s action under Section 74 without issuing notices under Section 61(3) is permissible under the statutory scheme.

Download PDF:
Nagarjuna Agro Chemicals (P.) Ltd.

For Reference Visit:
Allahabad High Court

Read Another Case Law:
GST Case Law