Maxim Tubes Company (P.) Ltd. VS Union of India

Mr. Nirzar Desai serves as a learned Central Government Counsel, representing the government’s interests in legal matters. His role involves providing legal counsel and representation in various cases where the central government is a party or has a stake. His responsibilities include advocating for the government’s position in courts, advising government agencies on legal issues, drafting legal documents, and ensuring compliance with laws and regulations. Mr. Desai brings extensive legal expertise and experience to his role, contributing to the effective handling of legal challenges faced by the central government.

Mr. Nirzar Desai, a learned Central Government Counsel, has submitted an additional affidavit-in-reply on behalf of the concerned party. This submission likely pertains to a legal matter or case where Mr. Desai represents the Central Government. Affidavits-in-reply are legal documents that respond to previously filed affidavits, typically addressing points raised by the opposing party. In this context, Mr. Desai’s affidavit serves to clarify, refute, or provide additional information crucial to the case’s proceedings. His role as a counsel indicates his responsibility in advocating for the Central Government’s position within the legal framework of the proceedings, ensuring that all relevant aspects of the case are duly addressed and represented.

Mr. Nirzar Desai, a learned Central Government Counsel, has submitted an additional affidavit-in-reply on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 and 3. The court has accepted this submission and it is now part of the official record.

Mr. Nirzar Desai, who serves as the learned Central Government Counsel, has submitted an additional affidavit-in-reply representing respondent Nos. 2 and 3. The court has officially accepted this submission.

The proceedings included arguments from both Mr. Paresh Dave and Mr. Abhishek Rastogi, who are learned counsels involved in the case.

1. Mr. Nirzar Desai, representing the Central Government Counsel, has submitted an additional affidavit-in-reply on behalf of respondents 2 and 3. The court has accepted this submission and recorded it as part of the proceedings.

2. The court heard arguments from Mr. Paresh Dave and Mr. Abhishek Rastogi, who are advocates representing the petitioners in their respective cases.

This indicates a legal proceeding where responses and arguments are being presented before the court, likely concerning a matter involving multiple parties and legal positions.

1. Nirzar Desai, acting as the learned Central Government Counsel, has submitted an additional affidavit-in-reply on behalf of respondents 2 and 3. The court has accepted this affidavit and added it to the case record.

2. The court has heard arguments from Mr. Paresh Dave and Mr. Abhishek Rastogi, who are representing the petitioners in their respective cases.

3. The next hearing is scheduled for January 17, 2019, to continue proceedings.

This summary captures the key points from the statement regarding legal proceedings and the actions taken by both parties in court.

Download PDF:

For Reference Visit:

Read Another Case Law:

GST Case law: