Case Title | Tejus Vertrage Infra LLP VS Union of India |
Court | Bombay High Court |
Honorable Judges | Justice Nitin Jamdar Justice Abhay Ahuja |
Citation | 2023 (02) GSTPanacea 338 HC Bombay Writ Petition No.13709 Of 2022 |
Judgement Date | 23-February-2023 |
The claim of the Petitioner has been rejected due to a delay; the learned counsel for the Petitioner references decisions made by the Division Benches of this Court in the case of Saiher.
the rejection of the petitioner’s claim is based on delay, with the petitioner’s counsel citing precedent from Division Benches of this Court, specifically the case of SaiherSupply Chain Consulting Private Limited Vs. Union of India and another.
The petitioner’s claim was dismissed due to procedural delay. The petitioner’s counsel cited precedents from Division Benches of the court in SaiherSupply Chain Consulting Private Limited Vs. Union of India and anr. and Prieceline.com Technology India LLP Vs. The Union of India and others, as well as a relevant Supreme Court case, The Assistant.
The Petitioner’s claim was dismissed due to the delay in filing. The Petitioner’s counsel cited relevant decisions from Division Benches of this Court in SaiherSupply Chain Consulting Private Limited Vs. Union of India and anr. and Prieceline.com Technology India LLP Vs. The Union of India and others, as well as a ruling from the Hon’ble Supreme Court in The Assistant Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Division -X and anr. Vs.
The Petitioner’s claim is dismissed due to procedural delay. Counsel for the Petitioner cites previous decisions from Division Benches of this Court in the cases of Saiher Supply Chain Consulting Private Limited v. Union of India and another, and Prieceline.com Technology India LLP v. The Union of India and others, as well as the Supreme Court’s ruling in The Assistant Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Division -X and another v. Saiher Supply Chain Consulting Private Limited. Respondents’ counsel requests time for further instructions. Case adjourned to February 23, 2023.
The petitioner’s claim is dismissed due to procedural delay. The petitioner’s counsel cited relevant judgments from Division Benches of this Court, including Saiher Supply Chain Consulting Private Limited Vs. Union of India and another, as well as Prieceline.com Technology India LLP Vs. The Union of India and others. Additionally, reference was made to a Supreme Court decision involving The Assistant Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Division -X and another versus Saiher Supply Chain Consulting Private Limited. The respondent’s counsel requested time for further instructions. The case is adjourned until 23rd February 2023.
The Petitioner’s claim was dismissed due to procedural delay. The Petitioner’s counsel cited precedents from Division Benches of this Court in cases involving Saiher Supply Chain Consulting Private Limited v. Union of India and others, and Prieceline.com Technology India LLP v. The Union of India, as well as a relevant Supreme Court case, The Assistant Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Division -X and another v. Saiher Supply Chain Consulting Private Limited. The Respondents’ counsel requested additional time for instructions. The matter was adjourned to 23 February 2023.
Download PDF:
For Reference Visit:
Read Another Case Law:
GST Case Law: