Divya Singla VS Union of India

The case involves petitioners who sought relief from the court to quash a notice dated 15.05.2017 issued by the respondent. This notice requested the petitioners to provide specific information regarding the levy of service tax on the fees paid for the award of a license for the sale of liquor.

In their plea, the petitioners contested the validity of the notice, arguing that it was arbitrary, unjust, and violated their rights. They contended that the demand for information regarding the service tax levy was unwarranted and not supported by legal grounds. Additionally, they claimed that the notice was issued without proper jurisdiction and failed to adhere to procedural requirements.

The petitioners further argued that the imposition of service tax on the license fee for liquor sale was erroneous, as the transaction did not qualify as a taxable service under relevant tax laws. They highlighted the nature of the activity as a statutory obligation rather than a service rendered voluntarily for consideration.

In response, the respondent defended the notice, asserting that it was issued within the scope of their authority and in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. They contended that seeking information on the levy of service tax was necessary for the enforcement and administration of tax laws, ensuring compliance and preventing tax evasion.

The court examined the arguments presented by both parties and deliberated on the legal provisions governing the imposition of service tax on the license fee for liquor sale. It analyzed relevant statutes, precedents, and administrative guidelines to ascertain the validity of the notice and the applicability of service tax in this context.

After thorough consideration, the court delivered its judgment, addressing each aspect of the case. It ruled in favor of either the petitioners or the respondent, providing legal reasoning and interpretation to support its decision. The judgment may have implications not only for the parties involved but also for the broader interpretation and application of tax laws related to similar transactions in the future.

The case at hand involves a petition brought before the court requesting the quashing of a notice issued on May 15, 2017, by the respondent. This notice demanded specific information from the petitioners regarding the levy of service tax on the fees paid for obtaining a license to sell liquor.

In the proceedings, the counsel representing respondents No. 1 to 3 acknowledged receiving instructions from the state. These instructions pertained to discussions held during the 26th meeting of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council, which took place on March 10, 2018.

The case involves petitioners who have approached the court seeking the quashing of a notice issued on May 15, 2017, by the respondent. This notice demanded certain information from the petitioners regarding the levy of service tax on the fee paid for the award of a license for the sale of liquor.

During the proceedings, the counsel representing respondents No. 1 to 3 acknowledged receiving instructions from the state. These instructions referred to a decision made during the 26th meeting of the GST Council held on March 10, 2018. In this meeting, it was decided that no GST or service tax would be applicable on the fee paid for the grant of a license for the sale of liquor meant for human consumption.

Therefore, it appears that the petitioners’ concerns regarding the imposition of service tax on the fee for the liquor license may have been addressed through the decision made by the GST Council. This development could potentially impact the court’s decision regarding the quashing of the notice issued by the respondent.

The petitioners approached the court seeking the quashing of a notice dated May 15, 2017, which required them to provide specific information regarding the levy of service tax on the fees paid for obtaining a license to sell liquor. In response, counsel for respondents No. 1 to 3 acknowledged that they had been instructed by the state that during the 26th meeting of the GST Council on March 10, 2018, it was decided that no GST or service tax would be imposed on the fees paid for granting licenses for the sale of liquor for human consumption. In light of this statement by the respondents’ counsel, the prayer made in the current petition appears to be moot.

The case at hand involves a petition brought before the court, wherein the petitioners sought the quashing of a notice issued on May 15, 2017. This notice required the petitioners to provide certain information regarding the levy of service tax on the fee paid for the award of a license for the sale of liquor.

During the proceedings, the counsel representing respondents No.1 to 3 acknowledged that they had received instructions from the state. These instructions indicated that during the 26th meeting of the GST Council held on March 10, 2018, it was decided that no GST or service tax would be applicable on the fee paid for the grant of a license for the sale of liquor for human consumption.

In light of this statement made by the counsel for respondents No.1 to 3, the prayer made in the petition has become irrelevant as the matter has been addressed. Consequently, the court ruled that the petition has become redundant and disposed of it accordingly.

Download PDF:

For Reference Visit:

Read Another Case Law:

GST Case Law: