submitted for release of Vehicle
Title | National Radio Electronics Corporation vs State Tax Officer (Intelligence) |
Court | Kerala High Court |
Honorable Judges | Justice Bechu Kurian thomas |
Citation | 2022 (1) GSTPanacea 201 HC Kerala Writ Petition (C) No. 40/2022 |
Dated | 04-Jan-2022 |
The issue was in this case was Invocation of bank guarantee.
Revenue Authority passed order against petitioner and invoked bank guarantee furnished by petitioner, while obtaining release of goods detained under Section 129(1) of the CGST Act
This Bank Guarantee was furnished by the petitioner, while obtaining release of the goods detained under Section 129(1) of the said Act.
Petitioner alleged that even without waiting for period of three months, respondents proceeded to invoke bank guarantee and approached High Court.
High Court held that the statute permits the petitioner to prefer an appeal within a period of three months.
It is essential in interests of justice that bank guarantee is not invoked till period for filing appeal expires.
Department is directed to withhold invocation of bank guarantee for period of four months to enable petitioner to pursue appellate remedy
submitted for release of Vehicle
The petitioner is challenging Ext.P3 order issued under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 to the extent it invoked the bank guarantee furnished by the petitioner, while obtaining release of the goods detained under Section 129(1) of the said Act.
2. The limited relief claimed by the petitioner is that the statute permits him to prefer an appeal within a period of three months and if within the said period of three months, he abides by the terms stipulated in Section 107 of the CGST Act, all proceedings for invocation of the bank guarantee or other proceedings shall stand stayed by virtue of the statutory prescriptions. However, even without waiting for the period of three months, the respondents have proceeded to invoke the bank guarantee, which according to him, is due.
3. The learned Government Pleader Smt.M.M.Jasmin, on instructions, submitted that the bank guarantee has not, in fact, been invoked and that the proper officer does not have any intention to invoke the bank guarantee before the expiry of the
appeal period.
4. Having regard to the period of three months available to the petitioner to prefer an appeal against Ext.P3 order, I am of the opinion that it is essential in the interests of justice that the bank guarantee is not invoked till the period for filing the appeal expires. The order dated 20.12.2021 produced as Ext.P3 shows that the 1st respondent has invoked the bank guarantee along with the order under Section 129 CGST Act, itself.
Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st
respondent to withhold invocation of the bank guarantee for a period of four months from 20.12.2021 to enable the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy. It is also directed that the petitioner shall keep alive the bank guarantee for a period of four months
from today.
Download PDF:
National Radio Electronics Corporation
Fore reference visit: